Quantcast
Blogs

Here’s your £35 million, sincerely Mr Ashley

|

The Club also managed to secure new key sponsorship deals with Puma as kit supplier and a long-term extension with its shirt sponsor Northern Rock, which will help the Club build its commercial and sponsorship revenues in the years to come.

The Club achieved a 24 per cent reduction in operating costs, from £98 million in 2008/09 to £74.4 million in 2009/10.

Wage costs were reduced by 33 per cent, from £71.1 million to £47.5 million, but the Club’s overall wage costs remained consistent with Premier League status.  The wages to turnover ratio increased to 90.6 per cent in 2009/10, up from 82.6 per cent in 2008/09.

“It has been a significant achievement to keep our overall loss at a level similar to the year before despite the impact of relegation, and our ability to do this has been helped  immeasurably by the continued financial support of Mike Ashley, who injected a further £42 million into the Club last year interest-free.“

Turnover                                                    2009/10 Results         2008/09 Results         % Change     

Total Turnover                                      £52.4 million                     £86.1 million                     (39%)  

Season Ticket Revenue                       £11.0 million                      £15.6 million                    (29%)

Gate Receipts                                         £6.5 million                        £5.5 million                      (18%)

Corporate Hospitality                             £2.8 million                        £6.7 million                     (58%)

Other Matchday Rec.                              £0.7 million                        £1.2 million                     (42%)

TV and Media Revenue                         £16.0 million                      £37.6 million                   (57%)

Commerc. Cater. & Sponsors             £15.4 million                      £19.4 million                   (21%)

Operating Expenses              2009/10 Results         2008/09 Results         % Change      

Total Expenses                               £74.4 million                  £98.0 million                (24%)  

Wage costs                                       £47.5 million                  £71.1 million                (33%)

Other Expenses                               £26.9 million                  £26.9 million

Wages to Turnover %                        90.6%                                 82.6%

There’s your numbers, stone cold. That means, in 09/10 season we ran the club with a loss of over £20 million pounds, further increasing the ever expanding loan to Mike Ashley.

There seems to be light at the end of the tunnel though. If you watch the figures from 08/09 PL season, our turnover is allot higher. We should be expecting about the same numbers in 10/11 season when it comes to turnover. However, with the strict wage structure in place, and transfer fees partly going in to fund the cost of running the club, and reducing its debt, our 11/12 season should see us coming closer than ever to our turnover match our expenses. And by 12/13 or even 13/14, the club should, in theory, be self-sufficient, if we remain in the PL. I think at that point is where MA should start claiming his money by bigger payments, reducing the overall debt, and making the club easier to sell should he want to.  You’ve got to remember, the club is only self sufficient when we can buy players without asking Mike to lend them to us and still pay our bills regarding operations and loans.

MA may only take £120 mill for the club itself, but the new owners would have to pay the remaining debt to Ashley in addition. Either from their own pockets or by mortgaging several of the club assets, putting us back in a, slightly improved, square one concerning finances.

What slot Mike Ashley has put the £35 million following the Carroll sale, I can only guess, but at least you have a slight indication where the money are going.

The 2010/2011 numbers should hold big improvements, but it won’t be enough just yet. Expect to see a chunk of any transfer fees to be withheld by Mike Ashley until the clubs running costs are stable.

It might not be what you wanted to hear from this article. But take comfort in that the club is being steered in the right direction financially. And don’t forget the effort MA puts into us having a top of the line youth system. Again, there is light at the end of the tunnel.

NothingButNewcastle.com is looking for writers. If you love the Toon get in touch at nothingbutnewcastle@snack-media.com

Share this article

45 comments

  • FrankLeeBrian says:

    This is spin – 1.3 million for Chris Mort? Wise’s salary (which we are still paying) probably 1 million – 0.5 million/year for Pardew, 10 million to Allardyce and Keegan, there’s 15 million before you start. We all know Shepherd and Hall were taking at least 1million a year from salaries (and associated family members another 0.5 million) – over 12 million in salaries alone. Lambias? At least the same as Mort. One million people through the turnstiles and only 15 million revenue? They’re taking the piss – £15 per game? When was that? 1992?

    I remember the days when I used to get squeezed through the turnstile with me uncle, the turnstile operator pocketing the 6 old pence my uncle handed over, and the under-reported crowd figures under Pirate Westwood – nothing’s changed.

    Same old Shysters, just more sophisticated accounting methods.

  • lenny says:

    every single club allardice has been at and sacked from has been relegated ashley sacked him because hes shite wise and keegan was his mistake slowly but surely he is learnig you dont get to be where hes at unless you have good business acumen kinnear was a d.wise move wise didnt last long ashley will get it right better days will come sound financial footing will bring success

  • John says:

    Sir,
    I had already read the guardian report into football finance which said roughly the same thing about our finances, but this filled in many gaps with the year-by-year comparatives.
    Overall, a very good article.
    The anti-Ashley brigade will, of course, disagree with it but I am sure they subscribe to General Melchett’s view that “if nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.”
    Shepherd put £6m of his money into the club and took millions out (before he sold it) yet to some he is a demi-God. He would have turned us into the new Leeds.

    • Kroe9 says:

      I think you’re confusing dislike of Ashley for love of Shepherd. Shepherd was an old crook, only after the gravy train and the status of Nufc.
      Ashley is a new crook. Two bellends don’t make a right!

  • Gorskino10 says:

    Well i have to say on finance he is doing a sensible job, you cannot allow wages to be over what you make.

    For that you can applaud Ashley.

    But for many other points you cannot, like for example Hiring Wise and Buying Xisco, Selling Milner over KK’s head etc.. etc…

    While Ashley is in charge we will NEVER GO FORWARD as a team, when any player is for Sale, with our habit of selling our BEST Players (Milner/NZogbia/Jose Enrique/Carroll etc..)

    Sometimes you cannot always find a bargain like Tiote and relying on Cheap/Free Agents to fill quality places is only bad for the club, take the fact 2 BIG players gone (Jose and Andy) havent been replaced, and when they have (Pieters & ??) they will not be BETTER but WORSE.

    Much like our team at Arsenal, if that was with Andy and Jose etc.. we could of done better Arsenal were there for the taking. We didnt attack and look beyond pathetic at making chances all we could do is defend which we did.

    Talking about defending, sometimes you need to spend good on quality, Tiote was a Bargain but others aint gunna be as lucky, I believe Colocini is worth EVERY penny we spent on him and say for Cheap you dont find quality like that not even with Willo etc..

    Future with Ashley means,

    * we will be sound finacally
    * having a YES-MAN as the manager
    * sell our best players for cheaper (Worse) replacements

    With the chopping/and changing with selling our better players, like which will happen NEXT season, we will never be a force and will be forever lurking around mid-table or maybe lower.

    All i’ll add is its hard to say this seasons team is better, ATM they aint, i preferred the team we had when we got promoted, which says alot.

  • Geordie_in_WYorks says:

    Thank you for the time, effort and figures. It all makes fantastic reading and whole lot of sense.

    I am a true newcastle fan and by saying that I know everyone that is one and reads this, suddenly takes a moment and thinks what that means to themselves.

    It is our life!!! Owners will come and go!! It is what they leave that we need to criticise them for ( like shepherd !!). Our current owner, that everyone is quick to slag off!! To be honest dragged us out of a pot full if *#}^ Yeah football wise we have done nothing but MA has brought us to the very top of the division of clubs that are finacially stable and in this day and age that is the foundations of a successful club.

    Why do we always look for the negative rather than the positive?? Surely as a toon fan we need to be positive rather than looking to blame someone!!

  • Sharpy17 says:

    A very impressive article, alot of facts I think we over look as fans, who just want to see big name/big money players come in and don’t care or consider where the money comes from. I as a Newcastle fan care more for the survival of the club in the top flight than a name on shirt. Look at man city for example…tevez cost a fortune n earns a fortune and there’s still no loyalty to the club, city or fans

  • David Dutch says:

    Quite a divergence of opinion as normal. The trouble is with the majority of Newcastle fans is that they read the red top rags every day and believe what they read especially if it is anti-Ashley. They just want to see big ticket players sign for the club regardless of the real cost to the club and the chance that we will slip back into the Shepard gravy train pit. Shepherd and his cohorts bled this club dry and knew exactly how to pander to the majority of fans bring in big ticket players on high wages. One player does not make a team. We have seen this over and over yet the crowd still bay for more, like a frenzied mob whose appetite can only be satiated by taking every credit card and maxing them out with no thought of repayment. You watch Man City have a major problem because their players are on the top wages – who will take them on when Man City do not want them, the players refuse to take pay cuts while under contract they would rather sit it out on the bench than drop their wage demands and play the game they are supposed to love (see Alan Smith comments when offered an opportunity to leave the Park but with a cut in wages – ‘I would rather SIT OUT my contract’) Tevez very few clubs can now afford him. Our own experiences of players on high wages they are very difficult to move on if the do not work out. Give me a team of sensible players who are proud to wear the shirt and are able to be blended together into a playing unit that wins more games than it loses. We will not win the league this season so stop acting as if we will, we will make steady progress based on a firm financial footing and in a few years have a team that is continually in the top sections insteda of a Keegan like attempt. Keegan is a GOD to some because he managed with a cheque book in hand just like David O’Leary, I never want to see my club back in that mould. I do want to see Newcastle play for as many years as the good lord gives me to spend on this earth and unlike most of you I have far more behind me than ahead of me. I keep saying all you can do as an honest real supporter is make yourself heard every saturday encouraging the team not wasting your breath insulting Ashley and Lambias they have their faults, we may never really understand them but guess what you have your faults also.

  • DAN says:

    ashleys lack of communications is what riles me the most but all this about trophy signing and we can’t afford them any more is rubbish!! if we sign a striker (which is what these trophy signings are) for 20 million and is on 80,000 a week and he scores 20 goals a season over a 3 year contract and those goals get US into a top 6 finish then that is good value for money. if the same striker flops and scores 9 goals a season then its a waste of money, so how about we Pay the money and get a proven goal scorer to spearhead or new season???? ……just saying like.

  • Sharpy17 says:

    Dan,that striker you speak of does not exsist,strikers who score 20 goals a season get bought by the bigger clubs, and as for Newcastle finishing in the top 6 that’s years away mate, look at money man u, Liverpool, man city, Chelsea, spurs and others have spent in recent years, then there are other clubs with better squads than ours, one 20m striker will not get us there I’m afraid. Dutch Dave is right, we need afew secure years finishing top half and above Sunderland, there are only afew trophies to be won, stoke won one last season with a squad that cost very little but with a good spirit and with their fans behind them, Dutch Dave is right, let’s get behind the players we do have rather than twisting about the players we don’t.

  • Sharpy17 says:

    I’ll amend my last comment, I meamy to say that stoke made Europe with their squad of player, Birmingham won a trophy and look what happened to them, look all I’m saying is let’s get behind our players who ever they may be

  • Hi,this is an excellent article,I found it on yahoo and I love it very much,I agree with you, it help me a lot in decision,but I am not follw well with the last part,can you explain it for me ?I need your answer,and I will keep on watching your blog

  • You can definitely see your expertise within the paintings you write. The arena hopes for even more passionate writers such as you who are not afraid to mention how they believe. Always go after your heart.

Comments are closed.